the porcelain bowl vol 3 issue 3
The Porcelain Bowl Volume 3 issue 3
(It all goes down the drain eventually, anyway)
Contents
I. Quote of the Week
II. Catch 22
III. You Speak (Frank Sasso)
Editors Comments: So I told you all that I was going to write something funny the next newsletter, I hope that you think that this joke and poke filled e-letter makes you laugh and encourages you to be the man that I know that you are....
QUOTE of the WEEK:
See Star Wars III you must, going to the movies, you are? -my best Yoda
Catch 22
Joke of the Week
Three Guys & The Devil
Three guys die in a major bus accident and all go to the gates of heaven. When they arrive at the Pearly Gates, the Devil meets them instead of God. He says to the men, "I am only allowed to let one of you three into heaven. I will choose the one who can ask me a question that I cannot answer." The first guy, a philosopher, stands in puzzlement for a while and finally asks, "Who was Polydectes and what did he do?"
The Devil snaps his fingers and a whole bunch of books appear in front of the guy. After reading all the books, the Devil answers correctly and poof, the philosopher disappears to hell. The second guy, a mathematician, asks the Devil the most complicated question ever. The Devil snaps his fingers and a whole bunch of books and papers appear in front of the guy. After working out the problem, the Devil answers correctly and poof, the mathematician disappears to hell. The third guy, an idiot, asks the Devil to get him a chair and drill seven holes in the chair. So the Devil drills the holes and hands the chair to the idiot. The idiot sits on the chair and farts. He then asks the Devil, "Which hole did I fart through?"
The Devil gives the idiot a dirty look and starts to think. The Devil finally replies, "The third one."
The idiot says, "Nope! The one through my butt."
(article from Ask Men E-Zine)
Test someone's intelligence
Does the salesman extolling the glories of a new computer you've got your eye on actually know what he's talking about, or is he just repeating what he read in a brochure? Is the potential employee at a job interview truly knowledgeable about the things he claims to know, or is he just feeding you the answers and buzzwords he thinks you want to hear? Whether we like it or not, we're constantly judging the intelligence of others, estimating their level of competence by evaluating their responses to our questions.
Some people are better at detecting intelligence than others, but that doesn't mean you can't learn how. With practice, you should be able to gauge the intelligence of others with a decent degree of accuracy, though you should always be prepared for surprises. Judging a book by its cover is impossible, but judging a book by its first few chapters might just get you somewhere. Intelligence is a hard thing to measure since there are so many different forms of it and just as many ways of assessing it.
In 1983, Dr. Howard Gardner, a professor at Harvard University, introduced a new, more inclusive concept of intelligence, which he called Multiple Intelligence. His theory moved away from the traditional "can you memorize facts, do math, think logically, and write perfect sentences?" types of measurement criteria, and opted instead for a more varied approach to judging mental abilities. The initial classification system consisted of seven categories, each covering a different area of intelligence: ? Linguistic intelligence: The skill of working with languages and words. While some people can master multiple languages, others struggle to learn just one. ? Logical-mathematical intelligence: Problem solving in a logical, Vulcan-like way.
The form of intelligence most frequently associated with geek-ish book smarts.
? Musical intelligence: The ability to think in terms of notes, pitch and rhythm, whether in the playing or composition of music.
? Spatial intelligence: Solving problems visually, inside one's head. Navigation and orientation are the more obvious examples, but abilities in art, sculpture or design are also key.
? Bodily-kinesthetic intelligence: Being in full control of muscle movements, hand-eye coordination and other sporty things. The opposite of awkward, klutzy behavior.
? Interpersonal intelligence: The ability to pick up on the moods, feelings and emotions of others. Social skills.
? Intrapersonal intelligence: Being aware of ourselves, our own feelings, and our own thoughts. With a few questions, you can tell if someone is a genius or a dunce
Factors to Consider
One of the most fundamental rules of assessing intelligence is to never assume that education equals brainpower. If you haven't already noticed, not everyone with a degree from an Ivy League university is bright, and not all people who lack a high school education are dumb. As the concept of multiple intelligences shows us, we don't all learn in the same way, and we're not all equally interested in the same forms of knowledge.
As a general rule, the brightest members of our society are also the most aware of just how little they know. Never trust anyone who thinks he has all the answers, paints everything in black and white, or believes that any argument can be reduced to good versus evil. Intelligence is about understanding that many problems have multiple solutions, even if you prefer one to the others. Contrary to what you might think, admitting that you don't know something is almost always a greater sign of intelligence than trying to pretend that you do. If you don't know the capital of Belgium, don't pretend to. If you get it wrong and the person that you're talking to calls you on it, you'll look (and feel) like an ass. There is no reliable, perfect way to test intelligence, and there never will be. That said, there are plenty of clues that you can follow to a logical conclusion -- as long as you ask the right questions.
Keep these handy pointers in mind when sizing up your subject's mental abilities: Ask general questions, not specific ones Anyone with enough time can memorize facts, figures and the like. Understanding larger, more abstract concepts is very different and more complex. Look for considered, rational answers Does it sound like they're repeating what they read in a newspaper, or have they actually thought things through on their own? Be wary of big words that seem out of place or are used incorrectly. Some people feel the need to puff themselves up by using words that sound impressive.
If their choice of words sounds awkward or forced, take note. Look out for buzzwords Words like "proactive," for example, should give you an indication that the person is talking in clichés that are devoid of any real substance. Listen for clichéd phrases Heavy use of clichés is a bad sign, but getting the clichés wrong is even worse. Make sure that you allow for cultural differences, as these idiomatic expressions are often hard for non-native speakers to learn.
YOU SPEAK- Frank Sasso
My experience with Special Olympics has changed the way I view service. I began as an assistant coach while working in New York; a friend in the office coached skiing. After I got over my initial disbelief that "disabled people" could navigate downhill at a high-rate of speed, I asked about swimming, something I had done my entire life. This was the beginning of a journey that has changed my attitudes and given me further inspiration. We practiced at Skidmore College, in Saratoga Springs, NY.
The palpable juxtaposition of well-off college students slaving over treadmills and weights compared with my Special Olympics athletes, mostly there to have a little social / fun time, filled the air enough to overpower the chlorine scent. As I was changing from a business suit into a bathing suit at my first practice, a 17 year-old swimmer named Nick introduced himself. I ended up working with Nick that night and spending most of our practice time with him thereafter.
Nick, although not one of the better swimmers, had the most amazing attitude of any of our athletes. He was always ready to try what I asked and often called me 'Paulie,' referring to Rocky Balboa's coach. Night after night, I watched Nick try things that the week before I didn't think he would ever be able to do: jump off the diving board, swim with his head in the water, or call me 'Frank', rather than Paulie or Frank Perrone, another one of his favorite nicknames for me.
Nick's weekly surprises made me understand that he was never quite who I thought he was, and always more dynamic than I gave him credit for. The experience of Special Olympics coaching continues to open new doors to a world that I'll never fully comprehend. Just when you think an athlete is in his or her own world, he or she will make an unexpected observation about you or your life. "Don't worry about work, now it's time to play." Being "disabled" is truly a label that our society places on people who mentally or physically fall outside of our "acceptable norms." It may be subtle or overt, but it's safe to assume that there is always more than meets the eye.
More importantly, coaching has showed me something I never understood during all my own years of competitive swimming: what it means to be a true athlete. When one walks around at a Special Olympics swim meet, it's rare to see any sign of pretense, class division or hyper-competitiveness that permeate many of our country's high school competitions. People are there to have fun, socialize and swim as hard as they can. As the athlete's oath states: "let me win, but if I cannot win, let me be brave in my attempt." You will not see more pure athleticism anywhere.
Frank :-)
thanks WB Frank, you always are an inspiration!!